| Subject | QS | THE | ARWU | U.S. News |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering | #79 | — | #1 | #17 |
| Automation & Control | — | — | #2 | — |
| Transportation Science | — | — | #7 | — |
| Metallurgical Engineering | — | — | #13 | — |
| Artificial Intelligence | — | — | #20 | #15 |
| Electrical & Electronic Engineering | #151-200 | — | #24 | #20 |
| Earth & Geosciences | — | — | #24 | #297 |
| Computer Science | #154 | #100 | #26 | #27 |
| Engineering & Technology | #176 | #88 | — | #28 |
| Telecommunication Engineering | — | — | #33 | — |
| Materials Science | #118 | — | #51-75 | #37 |
| Physics & Astronomy | #151-200 | — | #101-150 | #38 |
| Chemistry | #251-300 | — | #151-200 | #42 |
| Energy Science & Engineering | — | — | #44 | #56 |
| Nanoscience & Nanotechnology | — | — | #51-75 | #44 |
| Civil Engineering | #201-275 | — | #101-150 | #55 |
| Biomedical Engineering | — | — | #76-100 | — |
| Library & Information Science | — | — | #76-100 | — |
| Chemical Engineering | #251-300 | — | #101-150 | #88 |
| Medicine / Clinical | — | — | #201-300 | #95 |
| Environmental Science | #501-550 | — | #201-300 | #113 |
| Mathematics | #151-200 | — | #201-300 | #249 |
| Statistics | #151-200 | — | — | — |
| Business & Management | #551-600 | — | #201-300 | — |
| Business & Economics | — | #201-250 | — | — |
| Polymer Science | — | — | — | #226 |
| Economics & Econometrics | #451-500 | — | #301-400 | #241 |
| Natural / Physical Sciences | #288 | #301-400 | — | — |
| Linguistics | #301-350 | — | — | — |
| Education | — | #301-400 | — | — |
| Life Sciences & Medicine | — | #301-400 | — | — |
| Public Health | — | — | — | #321 |
| Arts & Humanities | — | #401-500 | — | — |
| Psychology | — | — | — | #485 |
| Biological Sciences | #501-550 | — | — | — |
Beihang University ranks #388 in QS 2026, #275 in THE 2026, #101-150 in ARWU 2025 and #207 in U.S. News 2026. Its consensus position across the major rankings is #206 globally.
QS weights employer reputation and international metrics more heavily; THE places more weight on research influence and teaching environment. Differences of this size between the two systems are common — see our methodology comparison.