| Subject | QS | THE | ARWU | U.S. News |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public Health | — | — | #27 | #11 |
| Nursing | #45 | — | #12 | — |
| Theology & Religious Studies | #16 | — | — | — |
| Medicine / Clinical | #54 | — | #16 | #20 |
| Biological Sciences | #95 | — | #32 | #22 |
| Psychology | #151-200 | #101-125 | #51-75 | #38 |
| Clinical & Health | — | #43 | — | — |
| Sociology | #251-300 | — | #46 | — |
| History | #51-150 | — | — | — |
| Political Science & IR | #201-250 | — | #51-75 | — |
| Biomedical Engineering | — | — | #51-75 | — |
| Life Sciences & Medicine | #62 | #70 | — | — |
| Pharmacy & Pharmacology | #78 | — | #101-150 | #63 |
| Accounting & Finance | #201-250 | — | #76-100 | — |
| Statistics | #201-250 | — | #76-100 | — |
| Library & Information Science | — | — | #76-100 | — |
| English Language & Literature | #101-150 | — | — | — |
| Philosophy | #101-150 | — | — | — |
| Anatomy & Physiology | #101-200 | — | — | — |
| Anthropology | #101-200 | — | — | — |
| Economics & Econometrics | #201-250 | — | #101-150 | #216 |
| Law | #251-300 | #201-250 | #101-150 | — |
| Arts & Humanities | #253 | #101-125 | — | #159 |
| Social Sciences & Management | #401-450 | #101-125 | — | — |
| Biotechnology | — | — | #101-150 | #185 |
| Chemistry | #301-350 | — | #151-200 | #366 |
| Environmental Science | #351-400 | — | #151-200 | #351 |
| Business & Management | #301-350 | — | #201-300 | — |
| Computer Science | #501-550 | — | #201-300 | — |
| Nanoscience & Nanotechnology | — | — | #201-300 | — |
| Education | — | — | #201-300 | — |
| Business & Economics | — | #201-250 | — | — |
| Modern Languages | #251-300 | — | — | — |
| Natural / Physical Sciences | #401-450 | #251-300 | — | — |
| Earth & Geosciences | — | — | #301-400 | — |
| Mathematics | #351-400 | — | — | #317 |
| Chemical Engineering | #351-400 | — | — | — |
Emory University ranks #182 in QS 2026, #102 in THE 2026, #101-150 in ARWU 2025 and #69 in U.S. News 2026. Its consensus position across the major rankings is #104 globally.
QS weights employer reputation and international metrics more heavily; THE places more weight on research influence and teaching environment. Differences of this size between the two systems are common — see our methodology comparison.