| Subject | QS | THE | ARWU | U.S. News |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Library & Information Science | #51-100 | — | — | — |
| Linguistics | #101-150 | — | — | — |
| Modern Languages | #101-150 | — | — | — |
| Philosophy | #101-150 | — | — | — |
| Theology & Religious Studies | #101-150 | — | — | — |
| Anthropology | #101-200 | — | — | — |
| Law | #201-250 | #126-150 | — | — |
| Mathematics | #301-350 | — | #201-300 | #130 |
| Medicine / Clinical | #301-350 | — | #201-300 | #143 |
| History | #151-200 | — | — | — |
| Nursing | #151-225 | — | — | — |
| Geography | #151-200 | — | — | — |
| Psychology | #201-250 | #301-400 | #151-200 | #289 |
| Arts & Humanities | #162 | #251-300 | — | #158 |
| Archaeology | #201-260 | — | — | — |
| English Language & Literature | #201-250 | — | — | — |
| Political Science & IR | #201-250 | — | — | — |
| Sociology | #201-250 | — | #201-300 | — |
| Physics & Astronomy | #251-300 | — | #201-300 | #277 |
| Biological Sciences | #301-350 | — | #201-300 | #327 |
| Pharmacy & Pharmacology | #251-300 | — | #301-400 | #228 |
| Agriculture & Forestry | — | — | — | #235 |
| Earth & Geosciences | — | — | #301-400 | #244 |
| Natural / Physical Sciences | #282 | #601-800 | — | — |
| Chemistry | #301-350 | — | #401-500 | #282 |
| Education | #401-450 | #301-400 | #401-500 | — |
| Food Science & Technology | — | — | #301-400 | — |
| Social Sciences & Management | #322 | #501-600 | — | — |
| Life Sciences & Medicine | #340 | #501-600 | — | — |
| Materials Science | #351-400 | — | — | — |
| Public Health | — | — | #401-500 | #355 |
| Environmental Science | #451-500 | — | — | #481 |
| Computer Science | #501-550 | #801-1000 | — | — |
| Business & Economics | — | #501-600 | — | — |
| Clinical & Health | — | #501-600 | — | — |
| Business & Management | #551-600 | — | — | — |
| Economics & Econometrics | #551-700 | — | — | — |
Jagiellonian University ranks #303 in QS 2026, #550 in THE 2026, #501-600 in ARWU 2025 and #427 in U.S. News 2026. Its consensus position across the major rankings is #469 globally.
QS weights employer reputation and international metrics more heavily; THE places more weight on research influence and teaching environment. Differences of this size between the two systems are common — see our methodology comparison.