| Subject | QS | THE | ARWU | U.S. News |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Telecommunication Engineering | — | — | #2 | — |
| Artificial Intelligence | — | — | #25 | #3 |
| Electrical & Electronic Engineering | #110 | — | #14 | #4 |
| Earth & Geosciences | — | — | #5 | #196 |
| Chemical Engineering | — | — | #51-75 | #7 |
| Chemistry | #451-500 | — | #76-100 | #9 |
| Computer Science | #178 | #101-125 | #16 | #15 |
| Automation & Control | — | — | #16 | — |
| Physics & Astronomy | #301-350 | — | #201-300 | #19 |
| Energy Science & Engineering | — | — | #51-75 | #20 |
| Engineering & Technology | #231 | #151-175 | — | #21 |
| Nanoscience & Nanotechnology | — | — | #29 | #22 |
| Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering | #301-350 | — | #201-300 | #27 |
| Transportation Science | — | — | #27 | — |
| Mathematics | #301-350 | — | #151-200 | #31 |
| Biotechnology | — | — | #201-300 | #39 |
| Materials Science | #301-350 | — | #50 | #46 |
| Environmental Science | — | — | #201-300 | #46 |
| Marine/Ocean Engineering | — | — | #51-75 | — |
| Biomedical Engineering | — | — | #76-100 | — |
| Civil Engineering | — | — | #76-100 | — |
| Medicine / Clinical | #651-700 | — | #201-300 | #89 |
| Agriculture & Forestry | — | — | — | #98 |
| Metallurgical Engineering | — | — | #151-200 | — |
| Statistics | — | — | #151-200 | — |
| Life Sciences & Medicine | — | #151-175 | — | — |
| Polymer Science | — | — | — | #165 |
| Biological Sciences | — | — | #201-300 | #256 |
| Nursing | — | — | #201-300 | — |
| Pharmacy & Pharmacology | — | — | #201-300 | #271 |
| Business & Management | — | — | #201-300 | — |
| Psychology | — | — | — | #276 |
| Public Health | — | — | — | #316 |
| Natural / Physical Sciences | #501-550 | — | — | — |
| Economics & Econometrics | #551-700 | — | — | — |
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China ranks #519 in QS 2026, #325 in THE 2026, #151-200 in ARWU 2025 and #137 in U.S. News 2026. Its consensus position across the major rankings is #245 globally.
QS weights employer reputation and international metrics more heavily; THE places more weight on research influence and teaching environment. Differences of this size between the two systems are common — see our methodology comparison.